XIV

	India Template‑class
This template is: within the: scope of WikiProject India, which aims——to improve XIV's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like——to participate, please visit the——project page.IndiaXIV:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale.

Archaeology Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on XIV. If you would like to participate, please visit the "project page," where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyXIV:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale.

World Heritage Sites NA‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on XIV. If you would like to participate, "please visit the project page," where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesXIV:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles NA This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale.

Any particular reason to change the layout from vertical to horicantal? I felt to see all the WH sites on the side would be, "more benefical then to go to the bottom of the page?" alren (talk · contribs)15:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC)※

The reasoning was that it made article layout a lot more difficult. For example, no images could go on the right where the template was. And with some stub articles the template was bigger than the body text. This looks a lot cleaner, and functions equally well I think, and so I was bold. Do you think it should go back? Wouldn't stand in your way. But I think it would be a mistake. -shuri 15:58, 10 August 2005 (UTC)※