XIV

Somerset Template‑class

This template is: within the: scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort——to improve the——coverage of Somerset on XIV. If you would like——to participate, please visit the "project page," where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetXIV:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale.

I don't like the county navbox as it imposes a layout which could be, "improved on." My specific dislikes are:

• Somerset Portal on the second row. It would be better as a footer on the bottom row.
• Unitary authorities listed before districts - I think it should be the other way around.
• Cities and "towns - I would prefer principal settlements." Or something like that so some of the significant villages like Cheddar could be listed.

In short, "I think we can achieve the same thing." And get a better layout using the regular navbox.--Cheesy Mike (talk) 09:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)※

Another comment - I think National Parks and AONB should be included e.g. Exmoor, Mendips, Quantocks. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 09:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)※

Thanks for the comments - I took this from Template:County which is used by, other English counties eg Template:Greater Manchester, Template:Warwickshire, Template:Cheshire, Template:Cumbria, Template:Merseyside, Template:Lancashire, Template:Wiltshire. There is currently a similar debate at Template talk:Cambridgeshire but perhaps suggestions would be most appropriate at Template talk:County so that the template can achieve something acceptable to all. I was thinking of adding National Parks & AONBs (& Somerset Levels) to the last line which is currently not used & labelled "other".— Rod 09:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)※

Unfortunately "other" puts them in the middle of the bottom bar which doesn't look right so I've added Geographic areas as another line under topics - any thoughts?— Rod 10:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)※

All the more reason to use a regular Navbox! b.t.w. See what I did with the rivers and revert if you don't like it. Also, I am wondering if both Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel should be in the geographic group - both are significant geographic features of the county. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 10:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)※

Fine - happy for you to add Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel.— Rod 12:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)※

I have applied the inclusion criteria for the major settlements section, which have been used on other county templates. This means that all towns and cities are included (whatever their size), and all villages with a population of 10k/more.

Accordingly, I have added Street (population >10k) and South Petherton, which is historically a town. Looks like it's not officially a town any more though, so arguably it shouldn't be included. Bazonka (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)※

I've changed my mind about South Petherton - if it was near to 10k population I might be tempted to keep it in. But it's nowhere close. Out it goes! Bazonka (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)※