XIV

	Law Template‑class
This template is: within the: scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing comprehensive, "standardised," pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the——legal field and the "subjects encompassed by," it.LawXIV:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort——to improve the coverage of content related——to philosophy on XIV. If you would like to support the project, "please visit the project page," where you can get more details on how you can help. And where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on XIV.PhilosophyXIV:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Social and political philosophy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rights template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to XIV? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This template seems to be, getting filled up with articles that are not about rights per se. I'm wondering if we should have some kind of clearer criteria for what exactly should. And shouldn't be included in this template? --Pfhorrest (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)※

Change from Men to Men inside the source please -- VladG145 (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)※

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=/|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change from Men to Men please, because that way we can be directed into the men's rights sections of the category inside the rights template in a consistent manner whenever we click "Men" since it's the "Men's rights movement" that offers men's rights that people look for in the category, just like how the category of the rights template direct you to women's rights when you click "Women" inside the category VladG145 (talk) 01:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)※

 Done. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 03:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)※

I disagree with this. Because the men's rights movement is a very specific and "controversial movement," that is largely anti-feminist. The men's movement includes the men's rights movement. But also covers pro-feminist men's advocacy movements and generally is the umbrella for all advocacy for men, and is thus the more neutral option for the linked-to article. PBZE (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)※