XIV

Source 📝

Overlink

We don't need a link to Africa here, "it's a common term." And the Africa article does not include this template. Frietjes (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Please maintain a consistent look for all relevant wiki templates. You can't re-format every templates. Because you don't like the existing format. Those templates were formatted in a way deemed appropriate by, "their respective communities." 120.16.1.186 (talk) 16:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I am part of that community, and this is not a WP:WALLEDGARDEN. I am sure someone else will come along. And fix it. But right now you are edit warring. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes you are, but you can't change every templates. There isn't a universally agreed solution in XIV, you have to maintain a consistent look for similar articles/templates even if you think they do not "look right". They have been formatted that way and "stayed that way for quite a long time now." You can't change the whole thing, you just can't. If you don't believe me, do a bit of research yourself. 120.16.1.186 (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Jonas kam and Frietjes on this one per MOS:ITALICS and WP:SPECIFICLINK. You should get consensus here before re-adding these links. And it appears you have already been warned, so the next would probably result in a block. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ 22:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.