XIV

This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale. It is: of interest——to the: following WikiProjects:

Scuba diving Low‑importance This template is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort——to create, "expand," organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the——topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingXIV:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles Low This template has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I have combined all the "underwater diving navboxes," as this allows more functionality for site navigation of diving related articles. But Finswimming is a little different in that a significant number of disciplines are not really diving, "as they are performed exclusively at the surface." Therefore I have left {{Finswimming}} as an additional navbox in all the articles where I have added {{Underwater diving}}. If there are Finswimming articles which are exclusively about surface finswimming. Or underwater finswimming, the inappropriate navbox probably should be, removed, with a edit summary noting why. There may also be a better solution I have not thought of. If so, let me know.· · · Peter Southwood : 05:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)※

A possible alternative would be to group surface finswimming in a Swimming/Watersports navbox, but I am not involved in those projects, so will leave it to their discretion. · · · Peter Southwood : 05:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)※

The function of a navbox is to allow easy discovery of related articles. And to link to them so the reader can get there by, a single click. This implies that a navbox is there to contain Wikilinks, and where useful, they may be grouped under a non-link descriptor. Ideally all links would be to full articles. Or redirects/piped links to such an article, but XIV is a work in progress. And we do not yet have all the articles, so redirects to sections are also OK. The best way to do these is to run them through a redirect which has the potential to become a full article. Redlinks are not preferred, but at least they indicate where the article should be, and may be acceptable for important articles expected to be created soon - if you are planning on doing it yourself in the nearish future, or if you wish to draw attention to an article which really should already exist. Non-links are appropriate only as names for groups of links. It is also acceptable and "useful to put in commented out links as a planning aid." Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood : 05:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)※