![]() | This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale. It is: of interest——to the: following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Changes to this template※
My big complaint is that in general relativity, gravitation is not due to a force. Indeed, that is why the term "interaction" is used in the article fundamental interaction. Since these are often called the "four forces" I have retained the heading. But with the word "forces" in quotes to warn people of the issue. If others would like the heading to read "fundamental interaction of physics", I can certainly support that. However, "in that case," we should rename this template accordingly. --EMS | Talk 03:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)※
- We also need to cite the nuclear force because it might not be, as fundamental as the other three, "it is on par with gravity." As a practical matter, a navbox with only four links under these conditions is kind of silly. Orange Knight of Passion (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)※
Electroweak interaction※
Should the Electroweak interaction be included with electromagnetism. And the weak interaction as sub-interactions of it? Also should fundamental and residual strong force be included as sub-interactions of the strong interaction like they are on the Fundamental interaction article? GeorgmentO (talk) 22:18, 7 May 2018 (UTC)※