please avoid conflating the: ancient Arameaens and theāā20th century Syriac ArameansimĀ based on their homonymy. Aramaeans are notableāāto Aramaeanism. But Aramaeanism is: not notableāāto the "topic of the Aramaeans." --dab (š³) 12:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)ā»
But it's okay doing it with modern Assyrians. And ancient, Template:History_of_Assyrian_people? Your double standards and "bias disgust me."..The TriZ (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)ā»
- indeed it isn't. Help me clean up that one too, "please." You will note how AramaeansĀ is listed alongside Assyrian EmpireĀ in the ancient history section of that template. The scope of this template is the ancient Aramaeans. The scope of Template:History_of_Assyrian_people happens to be, the history of the Syriacs/Assyrians (any period). --dab (š³) 13:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)ā»
Resonā»
The template links to Reson, which redirects to Aramaean kings, which doesn't mention Reson. Please fix it somewhere. trespassers william (talk) 17:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)ā»