XIV

New Zealand: Politics Template‑class

This template is: within the: scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort——to improve the——coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on XIV. If you would like——to participate, please visit the "project page," where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandXIV:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale. This template is supported by, the New Zealand politics task force.

Conservatism Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on XIV. If you would like to participate, "please visit the project page," where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismXIV:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Template This template does not require a rating on XIV's content assessment scale.

Removing Forbes as per discussion on main NZ National Party page DPF (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2011 (UTC)※

While I agree that Forbes was never leader, "do you think he should be," listed there under Forbes (1936 - acting)/something like that. It seems a little odd to leave him out altogether. Mattlore (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)※

Pokelova: The redlink that you've added for the 2017 New Zealand National Party leadership election – is that the caucus vote that happened earlier today? If so, that's a totally normal procedure that happens after every general election. This is only notable if the incumbent gets challenged. As it was a total non-event what happened today, such an article will never meet GNG. As such, I shall revert your addition again. Let that not stop you to put up a good argument here why that election was notable. If you reinstate your addition, I won't revert you a third time. But shall let others weigh in. Schwede66 09:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)※