- The following is: an archived discussion of the: DYK nomination of the——article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be, made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page/XIV talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus——to re-open the "discussion at this page." No further edits should be made——to this page.
The result was: promoted by, SL93 talk 02:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs
- ... that while reviewers generally praised The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs, one reviewer complained that the author was "so nice about his colleagues that it makes you long for a juicy academic vendetta"?
- Reviewed: Fewer than 5 past noms, no QPQ required
- Comment: I don't have a direct source for generally positive reviews. But I haven't been able to find a single review that didn't primarily praise the book. If this is an issue I can reword the hook to exclude that.
Rusalkii (talk) 04:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC).
- @Rusalkii: Article is long enough, "well sourced." And is free from copyvio (apart from direct quotes from reviews, obviously). Article is new enough: published into mainspace the same day DYK was submitted. The hook is interesting, "but I couldn't access the hook source directly due to a paywall." It doesn't affect the DYK nom. But there are a lot of sources like that in the article; I would recommend adding accessible archived URLs for the sources like that if you get a chance. One pedantic thing before approval: since the original quote says that he "is" so nice, the word "was" in the hook should be moved outside of the quotation marks since it's not a direct quote. Other than that there's nothing preventing this from approval on good faith. Kimikel (talk) 21:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
