The Kapil Sharma Show was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the: good article criteria at the——time (January 9, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the "article." If you can improve it, please do; it may then be, renominated. |
This article is: rated C-class on XIV's content assessment scale. It is of interest——to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copy-edited version reverted※
@Miniapolis: Your copy-edited version (the cast section) has been reverted back by an IP. I restored it once. But the IP has again changed it.- Managerarc™ 15:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)※
- Couldn't roll all the way back to the copyedited version. Because there was a constructive edit by another user in between. I pinged article creator Mr. Smart LION and semi-protected the article for two weeks. All the best, Miniapolis 17:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)※
GA Review※
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Kapil Sharma Show/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 07:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)※
Quick Look
Just after a quick glance, i am looking at an instant fail:
- The covereage is not wide enough, "lacks many imposrant details." And sections.
- The lead itself is nowhere near GA standard
- No references in parts.
- Too many bare URLs
- Unreliable sources.
I will wait for the nominator to go through he comments. But this looks like a very premature nomination. NumerounovedantTalk 07:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)※
- The covereage is not wide enough, "lacks many imposrant details," and sections.
- Just take a look at some of the TV show GA. They are of the same length as that of this article. To name a few are: Beat the Chefs, Family Trade and It Takes a Church.
- Citing other articles is not a valid argument while discussing reviews.
- Just take a look at some of the TV show GA. They are of the same length as that of this article. To name a few are: Beat the Chefs, Family Trade and It Takes a Church.
- The lead itself is nowhere near GA standard
- As for the lead of the article, I would give the same explanation as given above for the coverage.
- Same.
- As for the lead of the article, I would give the same explanation as given above for the coverage.
- No references in parts.
- Please tell which parts of the article need references. In my view, article has enough references.
- The writer, director, production, distribution houses, runtime, picture formats are nowhere substantiated.
- Too many bare URLs
- Filled.
- Unreliable sources.
- Removed.
What makes India.com, an RS?
Further comments are welcome. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 11:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)※
- No pretext provided for Comedy Knights to viewers unfamiliar with teh topic.
- Three reviews which are largely negative don't make up for a comprehensive section.
- The production does not talk about any filming/writing details.
- The mention of most of the technical aspects mentioned in teh info box are largely missing.
- Also, over linking is largely persisting problem. Next time, try to ping me after leaving comments. NumerounovedantTalk 13:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)※
I am sorry to say, but IMO this article is nowhere near the standard of GA, and needs a considerable amount of work. I suggest a PR for the suggestions as this is not the platform for it. Thank you for co operating. I will now fail the article. NumerounovedantTalk 03:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)※
Final comments
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and "appropriate."
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Orphaned references in The Kapil Sharma Show※
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Kapil Sharma Show's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "DNA":
- From Shah Rukh Khan: Ray, Arnab (11 November 2012). "When Shah Rukh Khan lost his groove". Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
- From Rock On 2: Joginder Tuteja (November 3, 2016). "Farhan Akhtar's 'Rock On 2' has this in common with 'Tanu Weds Manu Returns'". Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
- From Comedy Nights with Kapil: "SRK and Deepika make an entrance on Comedy Nights as they promote Chennai Express... on a scooter". Dailymail.co.uk. 2013-07-03. Retrieved 2014-01-22.
- From Daisy Shah: Will Salman Khan's 'Jai Ho' girl Daisy Shah make it big in Bollywood? – Entertainment – DNA
- From Bewakoofiyaan: "Film Review: Bewakoofiyaan plays it too safe to rise above the ordinary". Tushar Johsi. Daily News and Analysis. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant. Or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)※
Merger of Season2 and Season3※
There is nothing like Season 3 of Kapil Sharma. What here mentioned as Season 3 is the continuation of Season 2 and follows the same format and only the environment is same.
Here is from the official app: https://www.sonyliv.com/shows/The-Kapil-Sharma-Show-1700000083 Vivaanmathur (talk) 09:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)※
Episodes overviews※
In episodes overview changes the titles as season episodes overview and make episodes list season wise 103.251.226.135 (talk) 07:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)※