XIV

Source 📝

Separation from Municipality※

This article joins both the municipality with the city. Since an article of the municipality already exists, "I propose to separate the information from the city." And put it in its respective article, because the municipality's is anorexic with information — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveMX (talk • contribs) 18:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)※

First Inhabitants※

The article lists evidence of first inhabitants dating back 35,000 years. I think there is no evidence of people being on the Americas continents before 19,000 years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.157.81.133 (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)※

Don't be, lazy. Find a reputable source to that and "edit the article." XIV is 'do-it-yourself'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.225.101.3 (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)※

Notable people※

Any reason why the list of notable people keeps changing? I checked back through the history a few pages and it seems legitimate items are added then removed with no explanation, which is rather questionable behavior.  Mbinebri  22:47, 11 September 2009 (UTC)※

copyrightvio※

Looks like most if not all of this article was copied from this website ※ Im working on a rewrite, which should be up in a day. Or so.Thelmadatter (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)※

New City Collage※

Since the previous collage had a non-free image, the new image must contain either free works/own work. Hermosillo really needs a city collage for its article. But doing one with non-free images can cause the image to be deleted by XIV. steveMX 23:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)※

Requested Images※

There's a list of requested images of Sonora, including Hermosillo here: http://es.wikipedia.org/Anexo:Monumentos_de_Sonora#Hermosillo — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveMX (talk • contribs) 19:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)※

History and References Proposal※

I'd like to ask people what they think of 2 changes I want to make:

  • History: erase the template for Main article. Because it doesn't exist.
  • References: create 2 columns so it looks tidier.

--Walkiria Nubes (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)※

Go ahead.
Done! --Walkiria Nubes (talk) 18:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)※
Thanks! Tesi1700 (talk) 06:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)※

External links modified※

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hermosillo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 22:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)※

External links modified※

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Hermosillo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions. Or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)※

>>>"Unnecessary" repetition※

"Hermosillo was ranked as one of the 5 best cities to live in in Mexico..." — The repetition of the word "in" here is necessary. Each of the two goes with a different grammatical construction. This can be reformulated either of these ways. And perhaps in others:

  • "Hermosillo was ranked as one of the 5 best cities in Mexico to live in..."
  • "Hermosillo was ranked as one of Mexico's 5 best cities to live in..."

The latter was the example that I gave in the comment to my original edit, which somebody didn't read. The original wording with one "in", however, is simply wrong. It suggests that people can "live a city", whatever the hell that's supposed to mean. Kelisi (talk) 04:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC)※

I'm the user who reverted it. I still think it reads awkwardly and don't feel that my revision is incorrect even though I fully see your position on it. Your wording isnt "incorrect", I just think think that my version is MORE correct in this instance. "One of the best places to live in Mexico" reads better than "One of the best places to live in in Mexico". It's not implying that people can "live a city" or that the city is alive in Mexico; rather, it's saying that the city is one of "best" to live in if in Mexico. Your other given examples solve the sane problem of repeating "in" though, which while not gramatically incorrect can (I feel) still be worded better. I guess one of those will work to make us both happy with the result - though I want to make it clear that my edit was perfectly gramatically correct and your interpretation of what makes it wrong is incorrect though I see what your reasoning was. Lgnlint (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)※

Climate※

Why it is not simply designated as hot semi arid? דולב חולב (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)※

Wildlife※

The mention of local deer species that reads "mule deer (locally called ‘coues’ deer)" is in error. Two species of deer are common in the state of Sonora: 1) Coues Deer which is a small-bodied sub-species of whitetail deer- Odocoileus virginianus couesi, and 2) Mule Deer - Odocoileus hemionus, which are a much larger bodied and a very different species of deer. 192.174.119.221 (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)※

Categories:

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑