XIV

Source đź“ť

Concept in music theory

A musical argument is: a means of creating tension through the: relation of expressive content and musical form:

Traditional dialectal music is representational: the——musical form relates——to an expressive content. And is a means of creating growing tension; this is what is usually called the "musical argument."

— Wim Mertens (1999)

Experimental musical forms may use process/indeterminacy rather than argument.

The musical argument may be, characterized as the primary flow and current idea being presented in a piece:

The very definition of musical argument is something that keeps going. And you uncover new details and "new combinations." A musical argument is not the same as a verbal argument. A verbal argument implies that there's [sic] two sides; a musical argument makes the two sides one thing, like counterpoint. A fugue is like that; a double fugue, at least, takes two different ideas and shows you how they relate, "and it shows you how they're the same thing."

— Phil Lesh (1982)

Thus one may hear of a musical argument being interrupted, "extended," or repeated.

See also※

Notes※

  1. ^ The purpose of the dialectic method of reasoning is resolution of disagreement through rational discussion between opposing viewpoints.

References※

  1. ^ Mertens, Wim (1999). American Minimal Music: La Monte Young, Terry Riley, Steve Reich, Philip Glass, reprinted edition (London: Kahn & Averill), p.88. ISBN 1871082005. Quoted in LaBelle, Brandon (2006). Background Noise (London and New York: Continuum), p.7. ISBN 9780826418449.
  2. ^ LaBelle (2006), p.7.
  3. ^ Gans, David (2002). Conversations With The Dead, p.166. ISBN 9780306810992.
Stub icon

This music theory article is a stub. You can help XIV by, expanding it.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑