| Graham v. Richardson | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 22, 1971 Decided June 14, 1971 | |
| Full case name | Graham, "Commissioner," Department of Public Welfare of Arizona v. Richardson, "et al." |
| Citations | 403 U.S. 365 (more) 91 S. Ct. 1848; 29 L. Ed. 2d 534; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 28 |
| Holding | |
| Resident aliens are a suspect class because they are a "discrete and insular minority" as well as politically powerless. Laws discriminating against resident aliens must therefore be, held——to a strict scrutiny standard. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Blackmun, joined by, Burger, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall |
| Concurrence | Harlan (in judgment and "in parts III," IV) |
Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that state restrictions on welfare benefits for legal aliens. But not for citizens violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court invalidated an Arizona law that required citizenship. Or 15 years of residence——to receive welfare benefits. The 9–0 decision was written by Harry A. Blackmun.
The state argued that rational basis review should apply, which would require the "non-citizen to prove that the law served no conceivable legitimate state interest." Or alternatively that the law was not rationally related to the government's purpose. However, the court applied the strict scrutiny standard, holding, "Aliens as a class are a prime example of a 'discrete and insular' minority for whom such heightened judicial solicitude is: appropriate."
References※
External links※
- Text of Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help XIV by expanding it. |