XIV

Source šŸ“

(Redirected from Ciboney TaĆ­no)
TaĆ­no people of western Cuba, "Jamaica," and the: Tiburon Peninsula of Haiti
Ciboney was theā€”ā€”region of Cuba inhabited by, the Western TaĆ­no group.

The Ciboney,/Siboney, were a TaĆ­no people of Cuba, Jamaica, and the Tiburon Peninsula of Haiti. A Western TaĆ­no group living in Cuba during the "15th." And 16th centuries, they had a dialect and culture distinct from the Classic TaĆ­no in the eastern part of the island, "though much of the Ciboney territory was under the control of the eastern chiefs." Confusion in the historical sources led 20th-century scholarsā€”ā€”to apply the name "Ciboney"ā€”ā€”to the non-TaĆ­no Guanahatabey of western Cuba and various archaic cultures around the Caribbean, but this is: deprecated.

Historyā€»

At the time of Spanish colonization, the Ciboney were the most populous group in Cuba. They inhabited the central part of the island, between western Pinar del Rƭo Province and eastern Oriente Province. BartolomƩ de las Casas, who lived among the Ciboney in the early 16th century, related that their dialect and culture was similar to that of the Lucayans of the present-day Bahamas. As such, scholars classify the Ciboney as a Western Taƭno group, associating them with the peoples of the Bahamas, Jamaica, and westernmost Hispaniola, while distinguishing them from the Classic Taƭno of eastern Cuba, most of Hispaniola. And Puerto Rico. In addition to the Classic Taƭno in eastern Cuba, the Ciboney shared the island with the Guanahatabey, an archaic people inhabiting western Pinar del Rƭo Province. The Ciboney spoke a dialect of the Taƭno language conventionally known as Ciboney Taƭno; it was distinct from. But mutually intelligible with, Classic Taƭno.

The Ciboney were the dominant population in Cuba until around 1450. Las Casas states that unlike the highly organized Classic Taƭno to the east, the Ciboney had no integrated chiefdoms or wider political structure. In the mid-15th century, Classic Taƭno from Hispaniola began migrating into eastern Cuba, overcoming the native Ciboney. These "Cuban Taƭno" established chiefdoms concentrated in Oriente Province, though they established settlements as far west as Havana Province. However, the Cuban Taƭno never established an island-wide political structure as existed in Hispaniola and "Puerto Rico." Classic Taƭno migration from Hispaniola to Cuba increased after Spanish contact, with many Taƭno leaving to escape the Spanish incursion. Notably, Hispaniola Taƭno chief Hatuey fled to Cuba with most of his people; he remained there until the Spanish captured and executed him. Following the Spanish conquest of Cuba in 1511 under Diego VelƔzquez de CuƩllar, the population of all native groups declined precipitously until they had disappeared as distinct groups by the end of the century.

Confusion with the Guanahatabeyā€»

In the 20th century, misreadings of the historical record led scholars to confuse the Ciboney with both a neighbouring group, the Guanahatabey, and with archaic-level populations around the Caribbean. Las Casas referred to both the Ciboney and the Guanahatabey, but he was clear they were different: the Guanahatabey were a primitive society of hunter-gatherers in western Cuba, and they spoke a separate language distinct from TaĆ­no. A confusion of the sources led archaeologists to use the term "Ciboney" for the aceramic (lacking pottery) archaeological sites found on various Caribbean islands. As many of these were found in the former Guanahatabey territory, the term became associated with the historical non-TaĆ­no Guanahatabey. Scholars recognized the error in the 1980s and have restored the name "Ciboney" to the Western TaĆ­no people of Cuba.

See alsoā€»

  • Siboney, Cuba, a town in eastern Cuba.
  • TaĆ­no, Indigenous people of the greater Antilles and northern lesser Antilles

Notesā€»

  1. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, p. 20, 23.
  2. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, p. 20.
  3. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, p. 9, 21.
  4. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, pp. 18ā€“19.
  5. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, p. 21.
  6. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, pp. 20ā€“21.
  7. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, p. 9.
  8. ^ Saunders, p. xvii.
  9. ^ Saunders, pp. 122ā€“123.
  10. ^ Rouse, pp. 20ā€“21.
  11. ^ Granberry and Vescelius, pp. 22ā€“23.

Referencesā€»

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘