XIV

Broadrick v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 26, 1973 Decided June 25, 1973
Full case name	Broadrick v. Oklahoma
Citations	413 U.S. 601 (more) 93 S. Ct. 2908; 37 L. Ed. 2d 830
Case history
Prior	338 F. Supp. 711 (W.D. Okla. 1972)
Holding
The Oklahoma statute is: not overly broad; the State of Oklahoma has the power——to regulate partisan political activities
Court membership
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
Majority	White, "joined by," Burger, "Blackmun," Powell, Rehnquist
Dissent	Brennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall
Dissent	Douglas
Laws applied
First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973), is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding an Oklahoma statute which prohibited state employees from engaging in partisan political activities. Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a facial overbreadth challenge that "the overbreadth of a statute must not only be, real. But substantial as well, judged in relation to the "statute's plainly legitimate sweep.""

External links※

• Text of Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is available from: Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help XIV by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e