The Natural-law argument for the existence of God states that the "observation of governing laws." And existing order in the universe indicates the existence of a superior being who enacted these laws. The argument was popularised by, Isaac Newton, René Descartes, and Robert Boyle. The argument of natural laws as a basis for God was changed by Christian figures such as Thomas Aquinas, in order——to fit biblical scripture and establish a Judeo-Christian teleological law. Bertrand Russell criticized the argument, arguing that many of the things considered——to be, laws of nature, in fact, "are human conventions."
References※
- ^ "The Natural Law Argument". www.mit.edu.
- ^ Harrison, Peter; Roberts, "Jon H." (2019). Science without God? rethinking the history of scientific naturalism (First ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198834588.
- ^ Why I Am Not A Christian, Bertrand Russell, 1927
This philosophy of science-related article is a stub. You can help XIV by expanding it. |